2007-12-19 23:25
2007-12-19 23:32
2007-12-20 1:51
2007-12-20 2:54
2007-12-20 8:21
2007-12-20 9:31
2007-12-20 9:42
2007-12-20 9:46
2007-12-20 9:52
2007-12-20 9:58
2007-12-20 10:01
2007-12-20 10:14
2007-12-20 10:19
Is it really that slow?! I thought 3G speeds were reasonable .. can you tell I'm way to tight to have tried?
20-Dec-2007 10:14 AM
frenchmeat wrote:
But thats the point. It would take you ages to download 300mb over 3g via your Nokia
2007-12-20 10:22
2007-12-21 10:56
2007-12-21 12:32
2007-12-21 12:49 - edited 2007-12-21 12:51
2007-12-21 12:59
21-Dec-2007 12:49 PM
paholman wrote:
I'm tempted to move to O2 from Orange PAYG for their "Simplicity" SIM Card at £15 per month (30 day notice period) and a £7.50 "unlimited" usage bolt on. I have an unlocked N95 8GB, and using it more and more on PAYG for calls and data is costing me a fortune in topups.
Many networks define "unlimited" but cap to a limit, but do they actually do anything if you go over the limit. I read "3"'s terms and con's about this, and they said frequent overuse will bar you from using it until the following month.
Do "o2" have the same clause?
and yes, it's definitely against trading standards to call it "unlimited" if it's capped.
There's a crackdown in the UK on the "up to 8MB" broadband packages when hardly anyone is getting anywhere near that speed. Providers are being asked (not pushed) to describe their network speeds with a "minimum" or "maximum" as opposed to "up to".
The same should be done with Mobile Network Providers and their "unlimited" data plans. As someone else described it's either "unlimited" or "capped". It can't be both!
Message Edited by paholman on 21-Dec-2007 12:51 PM
2007-12-21 14:45 - edited 2007-12-21 14:49
2008-02-06 16:35